In today’s fast-paced and demanding work environment, the concept of work-life balance has become increasingly important. With the rise of burnout and mental health issues, many employees and experts are questioning whether giving 100% of ourselves to our jobs is sustainable in the long run. This has led to the emergence of the 85% rule, proposed by nine-time Olympic gold medalist Carl Lewis, which suggests that we don’t need to give our maximum effort all the time. In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of working at 85% capacity and whether it is a viable approach to achieve a balance between excellent performance and employee well-being.
Understanding the 85% Rule: Finding the Productivity Sweet Spot
The philosophy behind the 85% rule is rooted in the idea that maintaining a balance between excellent performance and output does not necessarily require giving 100% effort at all times. According to Carl Lewis, operating at 85% capacity allows for crucial headroom that prevents workers from burning out. This headroom can be used for rest, relaxation, and taking care of one’s well-being.
The 85% rule challenges the traditional notion that maximum effort equals maximum productivity. It suggests that by allowing ourselves some space and not constantly pushing ourselves to the limit, we can actually achieve better overall performance and avoid the negative consequences of overworking.
On the other hand, some employers may view working at 85% capacity as wasteful or unproductive. They may worry that employees who are not giving their all are not fully committed to their jobs. However, it is essential to remember that burnout is a real and tangible metric. Research has shown that one in four workers report symptoms of burnout, which can lead to increased sick leave, turnover, and decreased productivity. In this context, settling for a workforce that aims for a B+ instead of an A seems like a sensible approach.
The Pros of Working at 85% Capacity: Breaking Free from Burnout
One of the primary advantages of working at 85% capacity is the prevention of burnout. By not constantly pushing ourselves to the limit, we allow for necessary rest and recovery, reducing the risk of physical and mental exhaustion. This approach acknowledges the importance of work-life balance and recognizes that human beings need time to recharge and take care of their well-being.
Additionally, adopting the 85% rule can lead to increased job satisfaction and engagement. When employees feel that their well-being is valued and that they are not expected to constantly operate at maximum capacity, they are more likely to feel motivated and engaged in their work. This can result in higher levels of productivity and creativity.
Celebrities like actor Hugh Jackman have embraced the 85% rule, further popularizing the idea. Their endorsement highlights the growing recognition that sustainable effort is crucial for long-term success and well-being.
The Cons of Working at 85% Capacity: Striving for Excellence
While the 85% rule has its merits, there are also valid arguments against adopting this approach. Some argue that not giving 100% effort means settling for mediocrity or being in the wrong job. They believe that true passion and fulfillment come from pursuing excellence and constantly striving to improve.
This perspective is particularly prevalent among CEOs and entrepreneurs who run their own businesses. For them, taking their foot off the gas pedal even for a moment can be detrimental to their success. They believe that perfectionism and giving it their all are necessary for immediate rewards and financial gains.
However, it is essential to recognize that this perspective may not be applicable to everyone. Not all workers have the same level of autonomy or control over their work environment. Societal conditioning and external economic forces can often lead to overstretching and sacrificing well-being in the pursuit of non-stop growth. Embracing the 85% rule acknowledges that being good should always be good enough and that sustainable effort is essential for long-term success and happiness.
The Dark Side of Perfectionism: A Holistic Perspective
To gain a deeper understanding of the implications of the 85% rule, it is crucial to explore the concept of perfectionism and its impact on our well-being. Thomas Curran, Assistant Professor at the London School of Economics, has conducted extensive research on the subject and argues that perfectionism is a damaging trait rooted in a darker side of capitalism and a warped value system.
Curran’s book, The Perfection Trap: Embracing the Power of Good Enough, challenges the notion that constant striving for perfection is necessary or desirable. He suggests that societal conditioning often leads individuals to overwork and overextend themselves, driven by the pursuit of non-stop growth. This external force can hinder our ability to appreciate and accept that being good should be enough.
By embracing the 85% rule, individuals can break free from the perfection trap and adopt a more holistic perspective. This allows for a healthier approach to work, focusing on sustainable effort, and finding fulfillment in achieving balance and well-being.
Applying the 85% Rule in Practice: Real-Life Examples
As the concept of working at 85% capacity gains traction, various industries and organizations are exploring ways to implement this approach. Let’s take a look at a few real-life examples.
Example 1: Capgemini – Senior IT Business Analyst
Capgemini, a global IT consultancy, has embraced the 85% rule by recognizing the importance of work-life balance for its employees. In their job posting for a Senior IT Business Analyst, they emphasize the need for candidates who can handle diverse projects, cope with change, and shape business models. This role acknowledges that sustainable effort and maintaining a balance between work and personal life are essential for success.
Example 2: Tribeca Technology – Software Developer
Tribeca Technology, an IT Managed Service Provider, understands the value of sustainable effort by offering a hybrid work environment to their Software Developer position. They highlight the importance of key technical skills while also emphasizing support for upskilling and a focus on work-life balance. This approach recognizes that allowing for flexibility and maintaining a sustainable pace can lead to greater job satisfaction and engagement.
Example 3: Ernst & Young – Senior Consultant Forensic and Integrity Services
Ernst & Young, a global professional services firm, acknowledges the importance of sustainable effort in their job posting for a Senior Consultant Forensic and Integrity Services. By focusing on preventing white-collar and financial crime, this role recognizes the need for individuals who can support international clients while maintaining their well-being. This approach demonstrates that excellence can be achieved without sacrificing work-life balance.